Made-to-order fashion house · a client
A fashion house run on one board, from the first message to the bank.

- The organisation
- SAK Atelier
- The problem
- Orders arrived from the online store, WhatsApp, Instagram and the counter. Each lived in a different place. Some were never made.
- What runs there today
- Order boardRunning
- Production trackerRunning
- Handovers and trailRunning
- Material ledgerRunning
- Nightly bank checkRunning
- Payment screenshot readerRunning
- Dispatch and trackingRunning
- The figure
- Around PKR 5m
caught in two months.
- 8
- paid orders nobody was making, found on the first check
- 139
- payment screenshots checked against the bank’s own alerts
- 680
- production steps read straight from WhatsApp, none retyped
Nizento’s estimate of SAK Atelier’s first two months, Sept–Oct 2026.
- Status
- Running
- Uses a Nizento DS
- No
In more detail
Every order sits on one board from the first message to dispatch. Each piece is tracked through cutting, dyeing, makers, finishing and packing, and every handover is signed by both sides.
Every lot of material is in a ledger. Each night, the payments that came in are checked against the bank’s own alerts.
The modules involved
More work
Other cases.
Illustration
Every enquiry in an admission intake, answered and assigned.
In admission season, enquiries arrived on every channel faster than a desk could answer them, and nobody could say which had been answered.
Illustration
A policy manual turned into the steps people follow.
The rules lived in a policy manual that nobody could follow step by step, and parts of it contradicted each other.
Illustration
A year of bank statements matched to the ledger, to the last paisa.
Statements and the ledger disagreed, and nobody could say by how much or why.
Start with one conversation
Build what’s next for your organisation.
From enterprise software to AI, let’s create technology around the way you work.